NS CODE is the abbreviation of “New Environmental Protection & Safety Code System” which is an environmental solution code designed to control environmental and food (product) safety issues globally with same system and language directly by consumers worldwide. NS CODE is a consumer focused code that satisfies consumer health and safety environmental requirements of consumers as well as accommodating the existing producer focused barcode system.
NS CODE is based on internationally recognized ‘HACCP’ and ‘ISO14000’ for consumer health and environment. HACCP is a risk management standard for food safety, and ISO14000 is environmental management for pollution prevention. The safety of raw materials, the transparency of the production process, the impact of the production process on the surrounding environment and the willingness of the management to preserve the environment are disclosed through NS CODE.
It is the era to change consumption habit that emphasizes quality, price, and service are now time to change. Consumption standards in the 21st century are environment and safety. NS CODE will accompany consumers to preserve the environment and ensure safety. Just by checking the NS CODE, a new economic order centered on environment is created. NS CODE is the language that calls the era of environmental consumption.
The 5 indicators are represented by numbers from 0 to 9, which are the core indicators of the combined results of the tests in each field.
NS CODE is easy to check the safety of anyone with the naked eye. Detailed information about production history can be checked at anytime and anywhere through a smartphone and computer.
The NS Code makes it easy to check the safety of products even with the naked eye. Please click on each of the above indicators.
Code |
Details |
|---|---|
| 1 | No modification (no genetic modification is observed as a result of both qualitative and quantitative analyses). Products not related to genetic modification |
| 5 | 0.25% or less modified (modified by less than 0.25% as a result of both qualitative and quantitative analyses) |
| 6 | 0.25% ~ 1% modified (0.25% ~ 1% modified as a result of both qualitative and quantitative analyses) |
| 7 | 1% ~ 3% modified (1% ~ 3% modified as a result of both qualitative and quantitative analysis) |
| 8 | Over 3% modified. Qualitative analysis reveals genetic modification but not quantified. |
| 9 | Unidentified. Raw ingredients are complex and cannot be identified. If the biological test is difficult and the modification is not confirmed |
For processed foods, the percentage (%) indicates the blending ratio of the genetically modified raw materials. The person in charge of inspection and the person in charge of management of the above inspection items are disclosed to the consumer under their real names. If the test result is different from the truth or in case of an accident, the consumer can immediately claim the responsibility to the responsible person.
Code |
Details |
|---|---|
| 1 | Suitable for food |
| 8 | Not suitable for food |
| 9 | Unidentified |
As a result of safety check (HACCP), if any of the 88 items is detected or not confirmed, the food is judged to be incompatible and undefined. In the case of processed food, safety inspection code including safety inspection of raw materials is calculated.
Test items |
Specific test items |
|---|---|
| Harmful bacteria of human body | Salmonella SPP, Staphylococcus aureus, Vibro paraphemolyticus, Listeria monocytogenes, O157 (Escherichia Coli O157), Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Bacteria of anthrax, Brucella abortis |
| Antibiotics | Virginiamycin, Salinomycin, Streptomycin, Erythromycin, Oleandomycin, Chloramphenicol, Hygromycin B, Penicillin, Oxytetracycline, Nicarbazin, Ethopabate |
| Pesticide | r-BHC, DDT, Aldrin, Heptachlor, Zoalene, Carbadox, Flubendazole |
| Disease inspection | Anthrax, foot-and-mouth disease, mad cow disease, tuberculosis |
| Growth hormone | Diethylstilbestrol DES, Zeranol, Somatotropin |
| Environmental hormone | P.C.Bs(Polychlorobiphenyls), Benzopyrene, DEHP, Styrene, Dioxins |
| Heavy metal substance | Pb, Cd, As, Zn, Sn, Sb, Cu |
| Radioactive material | Sr 90, Cs 137, Ba 137 |
| Parasite | Protozoan, fluke (liver fluke, pulmonary stigma, Yokogawa squid), baits, nematodes |
The person in charge of inspection and the person in charge of management of the above inspection items are disclosed to the consumer under their real names. If the test result is different from the truth or in case of an accident, the consumer can immediately claim the responsibility to the responsible person.
Code |
Details |
Remark |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Special | When obtaining the highest score for each item |
| 2 | Excellent | More than 90% over the highest score |
| 5 | Normal | More than 85% over the highest score |
| 8 | Defective | More than 10% over the highest score |
| 9 | Unidentified | Less than 10% over the highest score |
Management aspect |
Physical aspect |
Document management aspect |
|---|---|---|
| It shows the will of environmental conservation of manager doing production activity. | It shows the impact on production site soil, water quality, atmosphere and influence from production site when food (product) is produced. | It shows whether the main documents necessary to prevent environmental pollution in production are being properly managed. |
The person in charge of inspection and the person in charge of management of the above inspection items are disclosed to the consumer under their real names. If the test result is different from the truth or in case of an accident, the consumer can immediately claim the responsibility to the responsible person.
Code |
Details |
Remark |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Special | When obtaining the highest score for each item |
| 2 | Excellent | More than 90% over the highest score |
| 5 | Normal | More than 80% over the highest score |
| 8 | Defective | More than 70% over the highest score |
| 9 | Unidentified | Less than 70% over the highest score |
Test item |
Specific test items |
|---|---|
| Design stage | Is it designed to minimize soil, water quality and air pollution from the initial stage of product design? Is it designed in consideration of recycling from initial stage of product design? Is it designed so that there is no physical, chemical and biological risk to the body of consumer? |
| Production process stage | Is the production process minimizing the soil, water and air pollution inside the plant and around the plant? Does it minimize the physical, chemical and biological risks to the workers in the production process and the residents around the plant? Are the raw materials and design methods that can be applied well at every stage of the production process? |
As in the case of environmental pollution prevention management indicators, the weight is determined according to the importance of each item, and according to the calculated result, the codes are listed in order of 1 (special), 2 (excellent), 5 (normal), 8 (defective and 9 (unidentified). The person in charge of inspection and the person in charge of management of the above inspection items are disclosed to the consumer under their real names. If the test result is different from the truth or in case of an accident, the consumer can immediately claim the responsibility to the responsible person.
Code |
Details |
Remark |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | More than 1% | The ratio of the cost of the safety of the food or product (goods), prevention of environmental pollution and production method to the total production cost (%) |
| 2 | 0.9% ~1% | |
| 3 | 0.8% ~ 0.9% | |
| 4 | 0.7% ~ 0.8% | |
| 5 | 0.6% ~ 0.7% | |
| 6 | 0.5% ~ 0.6% | |
| 7 | 0.4% ~ 0.5% | |
| 8 | 0.3% ~ 0.4% | |
| 9 | Less than 0.3% |
Test item |
Specific test items |
|---|---|
| Raw material stage | Is it designed to minimize soil, water quality and air pollution when selecting raw materials for production? |
| Is the level of pollution minimization quantified and quantified? |
The ratio (%) of the cost of food (product) safety, environmental pollution prevention and production to total production cost is used as an indicator. The person in charge of inspection and the person in charge of management of the above inspection items are disclosed to the consumer under their real names. If the test result is different from the truth or in case of an accident, the consumer can immediately claim the responsibility to the responsible person.
The NS Code is structured to focus on the core content of these key global standards. In particular, the key points of environmental ISO 14000 and HACCP are clearly disclosed to all.
The reliability of NS Code is very important to determine the code’s existence. NS WORLD Co., Ltd. has built a reliable system for consumers to purchase with confidence. The NS Code ensures reliability by using the internationally accredited ISO 14000 and HACCP as a production standard. If there is any problem or damage to the code-attached food or product, it is promptly responded and the progress is clearly disclosed through the internet.
